My Opinion: Jón Gnarr - Icelandic Meat Soup Jon Gnarr skrifar 30. maí 2015 09:00 Nationalism seems to be on the rise in Iceland today. People talk much about the so-called national culture, and cite history. This is especially prominent in political debate. Strangely, the debate is rarely about what I find the most Icelandic of all: the gift of poetry itself and artistic expression. It is not tangible enough. The Icelandic national culture seems, for the most part, to evolve around corpulent men who once said something, about processed meat, and some peculiar type of arrogance. Everything natural is turned upside down, and it isn’t the water that hollows the stone, it is the stone that hollows the water with a loud splash. Tenderness is gutlessness and poets are slouches who should stop writing their worthless nonsense and get a job, preferably in meat processing. Importunity and aggression are considered a virtue. Gentleness and politeness are not necessary. Why stand and wait in a line like a moron when you can so easily jump the queue?Vikings It is often maintained that our ancestors were all great Vikings. That’s not quite true. A few Vikings came here, but it was young farmers, slaves and losers who formed the bulk of the settlers of Iceland. It was not considered prestigious to live in or come from Iceland. The Icelandic sagas, especially the Book of Settlements, are our main source of information about the settlement. The Icelandic sagas, however, are not quite trustworthy records. The scribes wrote them down after older oral sources. The sagas are marked by poetic inspiration and exaggerations. Even though they pretend to relate true events, there seems to be a lot there for other reasons than to reflect the truth. No-one really knows why these stories were written. To some extent it was done for political reasons. The first Icelanders were accused of being the descendants of slaves and villains. That’s what they were called in ancient times, but today they would probably be called quitters and losers. People wanted to refute this by writing long genealogies that made them the descendants of Norwegian chieftains. It was also important to secure legal ownership of land. There are few records about peasants and slaves. The sagas are written about a small upper class, and with their needs in mind. Much of it is even a complete lie. For example, I seriously doubt that Ingólfur Arnarson ever existed. I think he was made up, like many others, for the purpose of propaganda.No dogs no Irish! In the Icelandic sagas it is usually maintained that we are all descended from Norway. Examinations of our genome, however, show more Irish blood than was previously presumed. Research indicates that almost a third of the settlers came from the British Isles. And most of them seem to have been women. It could be argued that a majority of our foremothers were British. But our Gaelic heritage has died for the most part and succumbed to our ardor to make us Norwegian. That was considered respectable while everything Irish was shameful. The Irish influence has been disregarded, even obliterated. I think the prejudice against red haired people has been, and even still is, part of this. We redheads are living proof of our ancestry. Perhaps the Gaelic heritage lost because it was so connected to women. The soft and artistic, feminine nerve could not compete with the Norwegian artless and practical importunity. It is also the habit of barbarians to treat artist like losers. I am inclined to think that our ancestors were, for the most part, peaceful and thoughtful people who were running away from the macho madness and bullying of the Vikings. People came here looking for peace and security. I think many of these people were poets. Creative people are rarely brawlers. Therefore, Iceland was an ideal place for all kinds of dreamers. Our nation has one of the highest percentages of ADHD. We are an artistic people. Not everyone succeeds. Creative people often lean towards insobriety. Most criminals suffer from attention-deficiency and a large majority of prisoners committed their crime under the influence. Many criminals are misunderstood artists. And now, when Icelandic politicians are yet again rewriting the history of Iceland for their own advantage, I want to say that I am proud of being an Icelander and the descendant of Irish slaves and losers. I think it is about time that this neglected part of our history gets more attention. It deserves it, and I think it would be very good for us as a nation. In fact, nothing is all-Icelandic, except the language. This is the Icelandic national culture. And it is the Icelandic wretches and losers who have preserved it because they are so often the kind of people who like to prattle and tell stories until someone yells: “Shut up, you loser, and go to work!” Wishing you a good weekend and all kinds of everything for losers! Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein News in English Mest lesið „Viltu koma út að leika?“ Hallgrímur Helgason Skoðun Hvers vegna vil ég sem Austurríkismaður hvetja Íslendinga til að segja NEI þann 29. ágúst? Stephan Zanzerl Skoðun Útlensk skólabörn, íslenska og enska Roza Matijević Ismailovski Skoðun Amma getur ekki eldað. Borgarfulltrúinn getur það. Bæði borga 1.900. Kristín Ólafsdóttir Skoðun Hefur einhver trú á topplistum? Dagbjört Hákonardóttir Skoðun Veikar konur, hið hæga þjóðarmorð og Reykjavíkurmaraþon Viðar Hreinsson Skoðun Hversdagsleg menning og majónes Logi Einarsson Skoðun Þegar Ísland verður 600 þúsund manna borgríki – hver á þá að framleiða matinn? Eyjólfur Ingvi Bjarnason Skoðun EES-líflínan er tekin að trosna Einar Karl Haraldsson Skoðun Una 72% evrópubúa sér vel í Evrópusambandinu? Andri Sigurðsson Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Siðferðiskirtillinn Jón Bragi Gunnlaugsson skrifar Skoðun Spörum milljarða Lárus Blöndal Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Drottningaviðtal – þegar ein rödd fær sviðið Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þegar náttúran verður okkur framandi Guðný Þorsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þurfum við kreatín og prótín sem bætiefni? Jóhanna Eyrún Torfadóttir,Dögg Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Af hverju aðildarviðræður? Björn Leví Gunnarsson skrifar Skoðun Hvað var afaðlagað? Þorvaldur Logason skrifar Skoðun Fullveldi - ættaróðal eða verkfæri sjálfstæðrar þjóðar? Martha Árnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Referendum: The Status Quo is Path Dependent Smári McCarthy skrifar Skoðun Amma getur ekki eldað. Borgarfulltrúinn getur það. Bæði borga 1.900. Kristín Ólafsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þegar Ísland verður 600 þúsund manna borgríki – hver á þá að framleiða matinn? Eyjólfur Ingvi Bjarnason skrifar Skoðun Gylliboðin sem ekki standast Ólafur Hannesson skrifar Skoðun Þegar mótrökin verða meðmæli Rögnvaldur Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Er ekki alltaf brjálað að gera? Sigríður Indriðadóttir skrifar Skoðun Spliff, Donk & Gengja á Alþingi Benedikt V Warén skrifar Skoðun Bannmenn og bruggarar Arnar Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Íslensk mjólkurframleiðsla er ekki skiptimynt í Brussel Sigurbjörg Ottesen skrifar Skoðun Hversdagsleg menning og majónes Logi Einarsson skrifar Skoðun Lærum lýðræði Ingibjörg Rósa Björnsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Referendum: What Is Path Dependence? Carl Baudenbacher skrifar Skoðun Veikar konur, hið hæga þjóðarmorð og Reykjavíkurmaraþon Viðar Hreinsson skrifar Skoðun ESB-aðild eykur áhrif smáríkja. Reynsla Íra er mjög jákvæð Dominic Scott skrifar Skoðun Hvaða Evrópusamband erum við að kjósa um? Gunnar Ármannsson skrifar Skoðun Hefur einhver trú á topplistum? Dagbjört Hákonardóttir skrifar Skoðun Seðlabankastjóri og stríðsöxin Halla Gunnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ísland þarf raunhæfar lausnir — ekki óútskýrðar stærðir og óraunhæfar sviðsmyndir Eggert Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun „Viltu koma út að leika?“ Hallgrímur Helgason skrifar Skoðun Vaxtaþrælarnir og hinir Ingólfur Sverrisson skrifar Skoðun Una 72% evrópubúa sér vel í Evrópusambandinu? Andri Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun EES-líflínan er tekin að trosna Einar Karl Haraldsson skrifar Sjá meira
Nationalism seems to be on the rise in Iceland today. People talk much about the so-called national culture, and cite history. This is especially prominent in political debate. Strangely, the debate is rarely about what I find the most Icelandic of all: the gift of poetry itself and artistic expression. It is not tangible enough. The Icelandic national culture seems, for the most part, to evolve around corpulent men who once said something, about processed meat, and some peculiar type of arrogance. Everything natural is turned upside down, and it isn’t the water that hollows the stone, it is the stone that hollows the water with a loud splash. Tenderness is gutlessness and poets are slouches who should stop writing their worthless nonsense and get a job, preferably in meat processing. Importunity and aggression are considered a virtue. Gentleness and politeness are not necessary. Why stand and wait in a line like a moron when you can so easily jump the queue?Vikings It is often maintained that our ancestors were all great Vikings. That’s not quite true. A few Vikings came here, but it was young farmers, slaves and losers who formed the bulk of the settlers of Iceland. It was not considered prestigious to live in or come from Iceland. The Icelandic sagas, especially the Book of Settlements, are our main source of information about the settlement. The Icelandic sagas, however, are not quite trustworthy records. The scribes wrote them down after older oral sources. The sagas are marked by poetic inspiration and exaggerations. Even though they pretend to relate true events, there seems to be a lot there for other reasons than to reflect the truth. No-one really knows why these stories were written. To some extent it was done for political reasons. The first Icelanders were accused of being the descendants of slaves and villains. That’s what they were called in ancient times, but today they would probably be called quitters and losers. People wanted to refute this by writing long genealogies that made them the descendants of Norwegian chieftains. It was also important to secure legal ownership of land. There are few records about peasants and slaves. The sagas are written about a small upper class, and with their needs in mind. Much of it is even a complete lie. For example, I seriously doubt that Ingólfur Arnarson ever existed. I think he was made up, like many others, for the purpose of propaganda.No dogs no Irish! In the Icelandic sagas it is usually maintained that we are all descended from Norway. Examinations of our genome, however, show more Irish blood than was previously presumed. Research indicates that almost a third of the settlers came from the British Isles. And most of them seem to have been women. It could be argued that a majority of our foremothers were British. But our Gaelic heritage has died for the most part and succumbed to our ardor to make us Norwegian. That was considered respectable while everything Irish was shameful. The Irish influence has been disregarded, even obliterated. I think the prejudice against red haired people has been, and even still is, part of this. We redheads are living proof of our ancestry. Perhaps the Gaelic heritage lost because it was so connected to women. The soft and artistic, feminine nerve could not compete with the Norwegian artless and practical importunity. It is also the habit of barbarians to treat artist like losers. I am inclined to think that our ancestors were, for the most part, peaceful and thoughtful people who were running away from the macho madness and bullying of the Vikings. People came here looking for peace and security. I think many of these people were poets. Creative people are rarely brawlers. Therefore, Iceland was an ideal place for all kinds of dreamers. Our nation has one of the highest percentages of ADHD. We are an artistic people. Not everyone succeeds. Creative people often lean towards insobriety. Most criminals suffer from attention-deficiency and a large majority of prisoners committed their crime under the influence. Many criminals are misunderstood artists. And now, when Icelandic politicians are yet again rewriting the history of Iceland for their own advantage, I want to say that I am proud of being an Icelander and the descendant of Irish slaves and losers. I think it is about time that this neglected part of our history gets more attention. It deserves it, and I think it would be very good for us as a nation. In fact, nothing is all-Icelandic, except the language. This is the Icelandic national culture. And it is the Icelandic wretches and losers who have preserved it because they are so often the kind of people who like to prattle and tell stories until someone yells: “Shut up, you loser, and go to work!” Wishing you a good weekend and all kinds of everything for losers!
Hvers vegna vil ég sem Austurríkismaður hvetja Íslendinga til að segja NEI þann 29. ágúst? Stephan Zanzerl Skoðun
Þegar Ísland verður 600 þúsund manna borgríki – hver á þá að framleiða matinn? Eyjólfur Ingvi Bjarnason Skoðun
Skoðun Þurfum við kreatín og prótín sem bætiefni? Jóhanna Eyrún Torfadóttir,Dögg Guðmundsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Amma getur ekki eldað. Borgarfulltrúinn getur það. Bæði borga 1.900. Kristín Ólafsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Þegar Ísland verður 600 þúsund manna borgríki – hver á þá að framleiða matinn? Eyjólfur Ingvi Bjarnason skrifar
Skoðun Ísland þarf raunhæfar lausnir — ekki óútskýrðar stærðir og óraunhæfar sviðsmyndir Eggert Guðmundsson skrifar
Hvers vegna vil ég sem Austurríkismaður hvetja Íslendinga til að segja NEI þann 29. ágúst? Stephan Zanzerl Skoðun
Þegar Ísland verður 600 þúsund manna borgríki – hver á þá að framleiða matinn? Eyjólfur Ingvi Bjarnason Skoðun